Just passed the NE exam with a 965. Whew. I was surprised not to get any of the RAS/modem questions, but I never found a definitive answer to the problem, so I guess that was a good thing. There was lots of stuff on Netbios, and using a DVM to test cables, so know your meter reading. Most of the questions on the exam were near-exact to braindumps, and the questions in the Creative Edge NE test exams, which are free and similar to Transcenders, so I really suggest checking them out. Especially if, like me, you cant afford the transcenders.
First, Id like to say thanks to all the braindumpers here; I studied from three books, the Coriolis Exam Prep (Very Good), Ques NE Exam Guide (Very Good), and Osbournes MCSE NE Book (bad badly written and confusing). I found that even the good books were missing in some areas. Also, copy out or print the braindumps and compare answers there are a lot of conflicts here, and you should go back to your study materials or web info and research anything with differing opinions.
Well, here goes my contribution. Sorry about the length, but I wanted to throw in something from real world experience, and since I just quit my job, Ive got the time. Anyhow, the things I was having a lot of questions about, and took extra time to go over were the DNS, WINS server, and NetBEUI stuff my work implemented this stuff only just as I left, and the consultant wasnt very forthcoming on letting anyone else know what was up with it. Heres the skinny I found on NetBIOS/NetBEUI:
NetBIOS names are 16 characters in length, of which 15 characters can be changed or set by the user/administrator the last character is used by the system, dont worry about it. NetBIOS uses several methods to resolve those names into IP addresses so it can find other computers or devices on the network:
So, WINS servers and LMHOSTS resolve NetBIOS names to IP addresses
DNS servers and HOSTS files resolve domain names to IP addresses
If none of the steps resolves the name, theres a problem somewhere. Depending on the method your network is using to resolve names, either the device youre looking for is not registered on the network with either a WINS server or in an LMHOSTS file, or its not registered with the DNS server or the HOSTS files.
Ive seen this question come up a few times, be careful with it, its a trick: Tom can log on to the network but cannot connect to a server on another segment using that server's netbios name. What is Wrong?
a) Tom's computer in not registered in the network naming server.
b) the server is not registered in the network naming server.
The answer is really clear if you think about it: How does Toms computer, using NetBIOS, get to a server on another network segment? The only was is to get the address from a WINS server, LMHOSTS file, DNS server or HOSTS file thats on his own segment. If he cant get to it, then it must not be registered on any of the name resolution servers on his network segment. So the answer is B.
This relates back to the inability of NetBIOS/NetBEUI to be routed. If your network contains subnets divided by routers, and your computers are using NetBEUI, they will only be able to see other computers or servers on their own network segment. In order to communicate with other computers, you need to set up a WINS server or LMHOSTS files (or DNS/HOSTS), and populate them with the addresses of the devices on the other segments. Then, when your computer asks for a computer on a different segment, it will be given the address by either the WINS server or the LMHOSTS file (or DNS/HOSTS). The computer will then have the other devices address, and be able to communicate with it directly across the routers, instead of using broadcasts, which would not reach the other device through the router.
My test did include the question: If a network uses WINS as the only service to resolve Netbios names and the WINS server is unavailable, what devices on the network will a computer be able to communicate without broadcasting?
The answer is NONE. Remember the order that the computer uses to search: name cache, WINS, broadcast, LMHOSTS, HOSTS, DNS. So without the WINS, the computer has to go to broadcasting, even to find someone on its own subnet. Therefore, according the question, it wont be able to reach anyone.
In another case, the problem may be that two computers have the same NetBIOS name. A WINS server does not recognize duplicate NetBIOS names; therefore if two computers have the same name, it will register the first one, and reject the second. Only the first one will be showing up on the network. In the same way, if the name is recorded with an incorrect spelling either your computer has it incorrectly, or the WINS server has it incorrectly - the name will not get resolved and you will not be able to find the address. The way to tell if one of these two scenarios is happening is to ping the missing computer with its IP address if the ping works, then the computer is online, but there is a problem with either the name being misspelled or not registered with any of the available resolution methods. Remember, pinging the IP address doesnt have anything to do with the name you can still reach a computer by ping that you cant reach by name, if it is online and turned on!
Also, a lot of folks have written about the question, which NetBIOS names cannot be duplicated:
and you have to choose three. The first is obvious, a computer name cannot be duplicated. The other two answers are a) workgroup, and d) share name. Why, Im not totally sure. I believe it is because they are names that a NetBIOS computer may request on the network, and therefore cannot be duplicated either. However, I had always thought the only one that needed to be unique was the computer name.
Some of the basic stuff everyone seems to be creating acronyms for memory for you can simply check out yourself on your own computer (either Win95 or NT), which might be a better memory jogger. If youre accessing this off a Win95 machine and are having problems with WIN to NetWare connections, or have IRQ memorization difficulty, look in your control panel. For IRQ stuff, go to Control Panel/System/Devices, then click on your network adapter or Com ports and look at their settings under the Properties tab. Check out where everything is set Ive done a lot of adapter installing at work (Sys Admin for Mac/Win network), and although Ive almost never run into conflicts with machines at work, I found my own home system totally whacked from the normal setup the books give you. I had a conflict a while back when attempting to install a network card in it to link to another computer, and now that I know what the preferred settings are, I can see where things need to be changed. That helped me really brought home the whole IRQ thing, so I didnt stress on it anymore. Also, if youre on a modem (a network at work will show this too), check out the Network settings in the Control Panel and see what protocol services are operating, and what connection services you have running Client service for NetWare, File and Print services for Microsoft Networks, etc. This stuff is right there for you to see (just dont change anything and cancel to get out of each window), and will make you feel more comfortable with the concepts having seen it hands on.
Always remember that most network problems occur at the physical level and thats always the first place to check; this was really brought home to me at work I cant tell you how many people came screaming that they all of a sudden couldnt get on the network, so it must be down. 100% of the time, they had put their feet up on the wall under their desks and hit the cable connection, disconnecting it, or had moved their computer around to make room for a boombox and disconnected the NIC. If one person is having trouble accessing the network, it is never a network problem, it is always a problem with the individual workstation. If it was working before, and isnt now, the answer is a bad network connection to their computer. (I also got zapped on this after an hour with on-call tech support from my home when my keyboard suddenly went out. After a bunch of checking, the guy finally asked me if I had pets. I do. And they had walked behind the computer and dislodged the keyboard connection. Boy, did I feel foolish. Thank god he had a sense of humor).
The Protocol stuff is basic and is just memorization get familiar with what youre using and ask at work if you can. If youre doing this without experience or work situations, well, study a lot. If youre in school or near a community college, go to the IT department and see if theyll show you around. Most computer guys love to show off their stuff, no pun intended. And getting a visual/physical grasp on this stuff will really help you make sense of it and feel comfortable in it. Maybe I got it because I work in a mixed environment and have been dealing with TCP/IP and AppleTalk and expansion for a while, but just realize that its really easier to grasp than you think it is - dont let protocols get you down.
Ditto with the routers, bridges stuff. If youre taking a class LOOK AROUND how are things set up? What about work, look at how stuff is set up there. And make tables from your study books and memorize them.
The server specific stuff and WAN communications are going to be weirder, since thats not really something you can get to unless you work for a big company and the IS folks are REALLY friendly. Study! And Microsoft really seems to be into ATM, although its too expensive for anyone except Fortune 1000.
I had a little different reason for passing this test than a lot of folks revenge! My company hired a consultant at 3x my pay to set up a new server system and wire a new office. All of which he did without any input from me or anyone actually working on the network. He didnt even ask what we wanted for future expansion, and spent $70k setting the damn thing up. Plus, he never gave anyone any documentation (god help them if theres a fire). More than anything, I wanted to learn this stuff to check his work, especially after I found out he wasnt even certified, and found a lot of things he said to me were direct quotes from some of these books! (To make it worse, he wouldnt work with me because he didnt believe this was the kind of work for girls. Arggh)
Good luck to all of you. See you on NT Server.